Journal of health oriented Islamic life style

Journal of health oriented Islamic life style

The role of religious beliefs and family functioning in marital commitment mediated by gender expectations in young couples

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Prof. Department of Psychology, Women Research Center, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2 sc. in Family Counseling, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background and Objective: Marital commitment is a multidimensional and sensitive construct in family life, influenced by socio-cultural contexts. This study aimed to examine the role of religious beliefs and family functioning in marital commitment, with the mediation of gender role expectations, among young couples.

Methods: The research design was descriptive-correlational using structural equation modeling. The statistical population consisted of young couples with at least 5 years of married life. An initial sample size of 400 was estimated based on Cochran's formula; after removing incomplete data, 250 participants were analyzed. Instruments included the McMaster Family Assessment Device, the Janbozorgi Religious Adherence Questionnaire, the Bem Sex Role Inventory, and the Adams and Jones Marital Commitment Questionnaire. Data was analyzed using path analysis in AMOS software.

Results: Religious ambivalence (β = -0.762), religious non-adherence (β = 0.351), and religious adherence (β = 0.235) had significant direct effects on gender role. Family functioning also showed a significant direct effect on gender role (β = 0.081). Gender role significantly predicted marital commitment (β = -0.572). Moreover, religious beliefs and family functioning had significant direct effects on marital commitment. The Sobel test confirmed that gender role, as a mediator, strengthened the relationships of religious beliefs and family functioning with marital commitment.

Conclusion: Religious beliefs and family functioning significantly affect marital commitment through gender roles. Therefore, attention to religious beliefs, family functioning, and gender role expectations is essential for strengthening marital commitment in young couples.
Keywords

1.      Cakı N, Asfuroglu L, Erbas O. The Relationship between the level of attachment in romantic relations, affective commitment and continuance commitment towards organization: a field research. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;26:1007–13.
2.      Perry SJ, Hunter EM, Currall SC. Managing the innovators: Organizational and professional commitment among scientists and engineers. Research Policy. 2016;45(6):1247–62.
3.      John NA, Seme A, Roro MA, Tsui AO. Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. Culture, health & sexuality. 2017;19(2):267–78.
4.      Agnew CR, Hadden BW, Tan K. It’s About Time: Readiness, Commitment, and Stability in Close Relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2019;10(8):1046–55.
5.      Stanley SM, Rhoades GK, Markman HJ. Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family relations. 2006;55(4):499–509.
6.      Harmon DK. Black men and marriage: The impact of spirituality, religiosity, and marital commitment on marital satisfaction: The University of Alabama; 2005.
7.      Nelson JA, Kirk AM, Ane P, Serres SA. Religious and spiritual values and moral commitment in marriage: Untapped resources in couples counseling? Counseling and Values. 2011;55(2):228–46.
8.      Ramirez Jr A. An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2008;25(6):943–65.
9.      Le B, Dove NL, Agnew CR, Korn MS, Mutso AA. Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta‐analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships. 2010;17(3):377–90.
10.   Mahoney A, Pargament KI, Jewell T, Swank AB, Scott E, Emery E, et al. Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of family psychology. 1999;13(3):321.
11.   Yoosefi N, Karimipour B, Amani A. The study model of religious beliefs, conflict resolution styles, and marital commitment with attitudes toward marital infidelity. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling. 2016;6(1):47–64.
12.   Jorgensen BL. The influence of religious beliefs and practices on marital commitment, parent-child closeness, and family involvement. 2010.
13.   Agha N, editor Kinship in rural Pakistan: Consanguineous marriages and their implications for women. Women's Studies International Forum; 2016: Elsevier.
14.   Carmichael S. Marriage and power: Age at first marriage and spousal age gap in lesser developed countries. The History of the Family. 2011;16(4):416–36.
15.   Gholipour HF, Farzanegan MR. Marriage crisis and housing costs: Empirical evidence from provinces of Iran. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2015;37(1):107–23.
16.   Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012(1):278730.
17.   Liu M, Hao R. Personal religiosity and marital harmony. Asian Social Science. 2017;13(6):112–20.
18.   Lichter DT, Carmalt JH. Religion and marital quality among low-income couples. Social Science Research. 2009;38(1):168–87.
19.   Markham I. Religion and ethics. In: Chadwick R, editor. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2012. p. 45–52.
20.   Rajabi G, Karimi VM, Taghipour M. Assessing The Model Of The Relationship Between Family Of Origin And Marital Satisfaction With Mediations Of Marital Commitment And Marital Empathy In Nurses. 2018.
21.   Al-Krenawi A, Bell MM. Gender differences in Syrian refugees in Jordan: Psychological, self-esteem, family function, marital satisfaction, and life satisfaction. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2023;69(3):714–23.
22.   Masomeh E, Daraei M, Shafiee FS. Predicting marital commitment based on family communication patterns, sexual satisfaction and marital intimacy in satellite employees. 2022.
23.   Bastam Kish M, Zare, Y. The relationship between family functioning and marital commitment with the mediating role of family resilience among teachers of Dana County.  10th International Conference on Knowledge and Technology in Educational Sciences, Social Studies, and Psychology of Iran [Persian[2023.
24.   Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Levin S. The McMaster model of family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family therapy. 1978;4(4):19–31.
25.   Caño González A, Rodríguez-Naranjo C. The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) dimensions involved in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and their mediating role in regard to socioeconomic status. Family Process. 2024;63(1):414–27.
26.   Mohammadi ZAK, Bazzazian S, Majd MA, Ghamari M. The mediating role of family function in the relationship between psychological basic needs, marital expectations and marital commitment. Contemporary Psychology. 2018;13(2):158–68.
27.   Eagly AH, Wood W. Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology. 2012;2(9):458–76.
28.   Blum RW, Mmari K, Moreau C. It begins at 10: How gender expectations shape early adolescence around the world. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017;61(4):S3–S4.
29.   Mahmoudi Y. Gender distinctions in institutional aspects of religion. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Psychology and Social Sciences (Tehran, Iran). 2017;82:82–91.
30.   Mu Y. The Role of Family Education in Shaping Gender Roles. International Journal of Educational Health. 2025.
31.   Khani Majd S, Pourebrahim T, Fathabadi J. An Study on the Relationship Between Gender Believes and Family Function of Kourd and Fars Students. Journal of Family Research. 2012;8(4):391–403.
32.   Sanai B, Alaghemand S, Homan. Family functioning assessment using McMaster model: Psychometrics of 60-item Likert-scale questionnaire. Iranian Journal of Family Research. 2018.
33.   Sanai B, Alaghemand S, Sh F, Homan A. Family and marriage measurement scales. Tehran: Ba'at; 2018.
34.   Janbozorgi. Development and validation of religious commitment questionnaire: 60-item Likert scale. Iranian Journal of Psychology and Religion. 2010.
35.   Momeni K, Rafiee Z. Correlation of social support and religious orientation with life satisfaction in the elderly. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2018;13(1):50–61.
36.   Bem SL. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974;42(2):155.
37.   Abedini M, Vahid H, Sangani A. Comparison of gender beliefs and attitudes toward divorce between Kurdish and Persian students according gender. Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal. 2018;3(2):45–60.
38.   Adams JM, Jones WH. The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72(5):1177.
39.   Mohammadi B, Soleymani A. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Marital Satisfaction as Predictors of Marital Commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2017;11(1):16–22.
40.   David P, Stafford L. A relational approach to religion and spirituality in marriage: The role of couples’ religious communication in marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues. 2015;36(2):232–49.
41.   Nā’īnī A, Shafī‘ābādī, A. A qualitative study of the role of religious commitment on sexual relationships and marital satisfaction.  Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social, Educational, Humanities and Psychological Sciences2017.
42.   Murray SL, Holmes JG. Maintaining mutual commitment in the face of risk. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2015;1:57–60.
43.   Tseng T-h, Huang HH, Setiawan A. How do motivations for commitment in online brand communities evolve? The distinction between knowledge-and entertainment-seeking motivations. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;77:326–35.
44.   Akbarzadeh Z, Honparrovan N. The relationship between the functioning of the main family and the level of differentiation and marital commitment in Shiraz couples.  The 7th International Conference on Psychology and Social Sciences; Tehran. [Persian].2016.
45.   Tariveh B, Karimi Q, Akbari M, Moradi O. Structural model of marital commitment based on marital communication beliefs, emotional involvement, and criticism in the family with mediating role of marital intimacy. 2020.
46.   Mickelson K, Claffey S, Williams S. The Moderating Role of Gender and Gender Role Attitudes on the Link Between Spousal Support and Marital Quality. Sex Roles. 2006;55:73–82.
47.   Eagly AH. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation: Psychology Press; 2013.
48.   Saeedi Z. Predicting Marital Satisfaction based on Attitudes Towards Gender Roles and Identity Styles in Couples. Journal of Family Relations Studies. 2024;4(14):31–40.