Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD Student, Department of Management, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran.
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran
4
Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is the biorhythm management model of higher education managers based on fuzzy approach.
Materials and Methods: The combined research method and research design are also of the exploratory mixed type (qualitative-quantitative). The statistical population in the qualitative part of senior managers and professors of organizational behavior management in higher education centers and in the quantitative part, managers, deputies and faculty members of higher education centers in the west of Mazandaran province in the summer of 1399, was 1044 people. Snowball method of 15 experts, with semi-structured and structured questionnaire and in the quantitative part, to measure the model, a researcher-made questionnaire with relative cluster sampling method was distributed among 281 samples. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by face and content method and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha method. Qualitative data were analyzed by fuzzy Delphi technique with SPSS software and quantitative data were analyzed by structural equation modeling and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with Smart PLS software.
Findings: The results of the qualitative part indicate that the biorhythm management model of higher education managers has four cycles and 28 dimensions of physical cycle (high mobility and energy, high physical strength, patience and physical stability, physical weakness, decreased physical ability, inactivity). And lethargy, doing useful things and excessive fatigue), mental cycle (interest in work and life, good humor, bad temper and temper tantrums, confusion and confusion, love of others, creativity in affairs and mobility in the face Behavior of others), intellectual cycle (promoting intelligence, comprehension and memory, forgetfulness, mental laziness, poor decision-making power, thinking power, gaining new ideas and not focusing on personal and work affairs) and intuitive cycle (Inner inspiration, strong sixth sense, absorption of negative energy and absorption of spiritual forces of nature).
Conclusion: The results of the quantitative section showed that all cycles and dimensions of the research formulation model were approved.
Keywords