Purpose: The subject of religion and ethics in relation to the two has always been a concern of philosophers of ethics and theologians of religions. Since religion explains man's relationship with God and morality is concerned with explaining man's relationship with his fellow human beings. In other words, morality has a human origin. Weber originates from the practical intellect of man. If religion has a heavenly and divine origin, the question arises: Is moral good behavior one by acting according to the commands of a religion or two different subjects? To be? Some philosophers believe that there is a difference between moral teachings and religious teachings, and theoretically they are right, but the theologians of the Abrahamic religions believe that the style of the scriptures in expressing the divine commandments is the same as their moral style and they cannot be one. The other separated. Weber believes that man's salvation is both in following the laws of God and in following the moral precepts. Historically, among the followers, commentators, and commentators of the Scriptures, ethics as knowledge independent of the law - as is common among the Greeks. It was not compiled.
Materials and Methods: In this article, with the approach of the theologians of the Abrahamic religions, we have tried to examine the common principles of these religions in the field of religion and morality. Is.
Findings: In this article, the connection, similarity and commonality between the basic principles and moral precepts in the Abrahamic religions and minor differences do not harm the basic commonalities and do not prevent the unity between them against polytheism.
Conclusion: From the study and comparison between religious and moral rules in the Abrahamic religions, we infer that the moral and religious principles expressed in these religions are general, general and common principles, and in some cases there are differences.