Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify, quantify and prioritize the dimensions and components of occupational regeneration in the administrative part of the Iranian health system through the research method of heuristic mixed model.
Materials and Methods: Statistical population in the qualitative department, a group of professors in the field of public administration - human and organizational resources in universities and higher education centers, senior managers of the organization and resources development in medical universities and professionals in the field of job design, in the department There were 342 employees in the administrative department of social security hospitals in Tehran province and in the prioritization department, senior and middle managers of social security hospitals in Tehran province. In the qualitative part of the snowball sampling method, 17 people, in the quantitative part with the relative cluster sampling method based on Cochran's formula, 181 people and in the prioritization section, 30 people with the non-random "targeted" method, were selected as a statistical sample. . Data in the qualitative part through the implementation of Delphi technique with semi-structured and structured questionnaire in four rounds, in the quantitative part through structural equation modeling (SEM) with a researcher-made questionnaire 34 items and in the prioritization part through hierarchical analysis (AHP) ) Was extracted with matrix questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS, Amos and EXPERT CHOICE software. In order to determine the validity and reliability in the qualitative stage, the necessary studies including acceptability (expert review) and verifiability (expert review) were used. In the quantitative stage, the validity of the questionnaires was divided into three methods: 0. to 0.1 and 0.8 to 0.1) and the structure (convergent validity range between 0.624 to 0.903 and divergent validity more than the correlation of the structure with other structures) was confirmed. Reliability was estimated and confirmed by three methods of determining the factor load coefficients of items (more than 0.4), Cronbach's alpha of components (between 0.786 to 0.873) and combined reliability (between 0.780 to 0.913). In the prioritization section, the content of the matrix questionnaire was approved by five academic and organizational experts in terms of comprehensibility and expressiveness, and the incompatibility rate of the whole model was calculated and confirmed as 0.04.
Findings: Qualitative findings showed that the job regeneration model in the health system has four dimensions (structural, functional, relational and cognitive), twelve components (formality, focus, complexity, scope, control, independence, nature, feedback, assistance, counseling, perception of Self, perception of job and attitude) and thirty-four indicators.
Conclusion: The results of the quantitative section showed that all dimensions and components of the research model were approved. The results of the prioritization section also indicate that the "task" dimension is more important.